Sweeney v. Sweeney

642 N.E.2d 629, 71 Ohio St. 3d 169, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2806
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1994·No. No. 94-23·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

This cause is before this court upon the certification of the Court of Appeals for Fayette County that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Medina County in Krnac v. Starman (1992), 83 Ohio App.3d 578, 615 N.E.2d 344, and with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Licking County in Farley v. Farley (1992), 85 Ohio App.3d 113, 619 N.E.2d 427.

The issue certified to this court is “whether a domestic relations court retains jurisdiction to grant visitation rights under R.C. 3109.051 to a ‘former’ grandparent despite a step-parent adoption under R.C. 3107.15. In other words, what effect, if any, does R.C. 3107.15 have on the provisions of R.C. 3109.051 in the context of a step-parent adoption.”

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re Martin (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 250, 626 N.E.2d 82, and In re Adoption of Ridenour (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 319, 574 N.E.2d 1055, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated. This court finds no abuse of discretion by the trial court.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sweeney v. Sweeney, 642 N.E.2d 629, 71 Ohio St. 3d 169, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2806 (Ohio 1994).

642 N.E.2d 629 (Sweeney v. Sweeney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M.T.O. v. A.O.
2026 Ohio 454 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2026)
In Re Matter of Stevenson, Unpublished Decision (2-13-2006)
2006 Ohio 607 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
State ex rel. Kaylor v. Bruening
1997 Ohio 350 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)