Sweeney v. State
683 So. 2d 213, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12632, 1996 WL 685832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sweeney v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 633 So. 2d 66 →
Opinion
We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion, which challenged his conviction for attempted felony murder based on State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995). As in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we certify to the supreme court the following question as one of great public importance:
IS STATE V. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (FLA.1995), RETROACTIVE?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sweeney v. State, 683 So. 2d 213, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12632, 1996 WL 685832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
683 So. 2d 213 (Sweeney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Freeman v. State
679 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
State v. Gray
654 So. 2d 552 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)