Sweeney v. Senn

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Sweeney v. Senn

35 Misc. 825, 72 N.Y.S. 1131

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 825 (Sweeney v. Senn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sweeney v. Senn, 35 Misc. 825, 72 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no negligence shown in the record, which produced the loss of the overcoat. There was a course of procedure in the care of the room, established by the defendant, as proprietor, and even that procedure is not connected with the loss, and if it had appeared to have been, the plaintiff had long acquiesced in the care of the room and the management of the key, and was himself negligent.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is no negligence shown in the record, which produced the loss of the overcoat. There was a course of procedure in the care of the room, established by the defendant, as proprietor, and even that procedure is not connected with the loss, and if it had appeared to have been, the plaintiff had long acquiesced in the care of the room and the management of the key, and was himself negligent.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 825, 72 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeney-v-senn-nyappterm-1901.