Sweeney v. Redmond
4 Misc. 608
This text of 4 Misc. 608 (Sweeney v. Redmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sweeney v. Redmond, 4 Misc. 608 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
The questions presented for solution on this appeal are only those involving facts in respect whereof there is a conflict of evidence. Careful consideration of the evidence satisfies us that the decision of the justice was in all respects correct, and, therefore, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Misc. 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeney-v-redmond-nyctcompl-1893.