Sweeney v. Recreational Industries, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Sweeney v. Recreational Industries, Inc.

115 F. App'x 646

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 22, 2004

DocketNo. 04-1894

StatusPublished

This text of 115 F. App'x 646 (Sweeney v. Recreational Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sweeney v. Recreational Industries, Inc., 115 F. App'x 646 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

LaVerne Sweeney appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sweeney v. Recreational Indus., Inc., No. CA-02-158WMN (D. Md. June 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

LaVerne Sweeney appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sweeney v. Recreational Indus., Inc., No. CA-02-158WMN (D. Md. June 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 F. App'x 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeney-v-recreational-industries-inc-ca4-2004.