Sweeney v. Moore

251 A.D. 743, 297 N.Y.S. 790, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7343

This text of 251 A.D. 743 (Sweeney v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sweeney v. Moore, 251 A.D. 743, 297 N.Y.S. 790, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

In a stockholders’ action charging that the appealing defendants, as directors, voted for and paid to themselves excessive and unreasonable salaries, and seeking to recover, for the benefit of the corporation, the excessive amounts so paid, judgment for plaintiff unanimously affirmed, [744]*744with costs. Conclusions of law numbered 1 and 3 in the defendants’ requests to find are struck out as inconsistent. The appealing defendants failed to establish alleged ratification by the plaintiff, with full knowledge of the facts and of her legal rights. (Adair v. Brimmer, 74 N. Y. 539, 554.) Present —■ Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adair v. . Brimmer
74 N.Y. 539 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 743, 297 N.Y.S. 790, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeney-v-moore-nyappdiv-1937.