Sweeney v. McQuaid
141 A. 307, 83 N.H. 585, 1928 N.H. LEXIS 52
Opinion
In the absence of brief or oral argument by the defendant, no reason is perceived why the court did not have jurisdiction of both the parties and the cause of action. P. L., c. 323, s. 18; Patten v. Patten, 79 N. H. 388; Dolber v. Young, 81 N. H. 157.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sweeney v. McQuaid, 141 A. 307, 83 N.H. 585, 1928 N.H. LEXIS 52 (N.H. 1928).
141 A. 307 (Sweeney v. McQuaid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dolber v. Young
123 A. 218 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1923)
Patten v. Patten
109 A. 415 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1920)