Sweeney v. McQuaid
141 A. 307, 83 N.H. 585, 1928 N.H. LEXIS 52
This text of 141 A. 307 (Sweeney v. McQuaid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sweeney v. McQuaid, 141 A. 307, 83 N.H. 585, 1928 N.H. LEXIS 52 (N.H. 1928).
Opinion
In the absence of brief or oral argument by the defendant, no reason is perceived why the court did not have jurisdiction of both the parties and the cause of action. P. L., c. 323, s. 18; Patten v. Patten, 79 N. H. 388; Dolber v. Young, 81 N. H. 157.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dolber v. Young
123 A. 218 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1923)
Patten v. Patten
109 A. 415 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
141 A. 307, 83 N.H. 585, 1928 N.H. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeney-v-mcquaid-nh-1928.