Sweeney v. Kirby
This text of 2013 ND 9 (Sweeney v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 1/23/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 3
In the Matter of the Adoption of D.J.D.
B.D.D., Petitioner and Appellant
v.
Executive Director of North Dakota
Department of Human Services; and R.H., Respondents
R.H., Appellee
No. 20120278
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Harlan Patrick Weir, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Daniel H. Oster (on brief), 619 Riverwood Drive, Suite 202, Bismarck, N.D. 58504, for petitioner and appellant.
Mark T. Blumer (on brief), P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, N.D. 58106, for respondent and appellee.
Adoption of D.J.D.
[¶1] B.D.D. appeals from a district court order denying his petition for adoption. Although his petition did not specifically request it, termination of the natural father’s parental rights would also have been required. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeney-v-kirby-nd-2013.