Sweeney v. Gardstein
This text of 160 A.D.2d 1002 (Sweeney v. Gardstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), dated March 6, 1989, as granted the plaintiff’s motion to add a cause of action sounding in wrongful death to the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the motion is denied, with leave to renew should the plaintiff be so advised, in accordance herewith.
While we agree that leave to amend a pleading should be freely granted in accordance with CPLR 3025 (b) (see, Edenwald Contr. Co. v City of New York, 60 NY2d 957), here we are not presented with a sworn statement of a medical expert establishing that the plaintiff’s decedent died as a result of medical malpractice. Such a statement is required to support the subject motion (see, McGuire v Small, 129 AD2d 429; Liebman v Newhouse, 122 AD2d 252; Shapiro v Beer, 121 AD2d 528). A sworn statement by counsel is insufficient for that purpose since an attorney is not qualified as a medical expert and cannot attest that medical malpractice was the cause of death (see, Fiorentino v Cobble Hill Nursing Home, 101 AD2d 825). A sworn statement to this effect by a physician must include statements showing a departure from accepted medical practice, and that the departure was the cause of the death (see, Amsler v Verrilli, 119 AD2d 786). Rubin, J. P., Eiber, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 A.D.2d 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeney-v-gardstein-nyappdiv-1990.