Sweeney v. Cumberland County Power & Light Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Sweeney v. Cumberland County Power & Light Co.

95 A. 209, 113 Me. 570, 1915 Me. LEXIS 193

DecidedAugust 20, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A. 209 (Sweeney v. Cumberland County Power & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sweeney v. Cumberland County Power & Light Co., 95 A. 209, 113 Me. 570, 1915 Me. LEXIS 193 (Me. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff, a passenger upon defendant’s trolley car, claims that she was hit in the eye by a wad of paper thrown or tossed by the conductor at another passenger. Liability is admitted.

A careful study of the evidence is convincing that the plaintiff has grossly exaggerated her injuries, and that the verdict of $400 is unwarrantably large. The overwhelming weight of the evidence shows that the physical injury to the plaintiff was very slight'. For [571]*571this, and for the conductor’s act of indignity, so far as it affected her sensibilities, she is entitled to recover, and for no more. If the plaintiff within 30 days after mandate is received remits all of the verdict in excess of $50, motion overruled; otherwise motion sustained.

Connellan & Connellan, for plaintiff. Libby, Robinson & Ives, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff, a passenger upon defendant’s trolley car, claims that she was hit in the eye by a wad of paper thrown or tossed by the conductor at another passenger. Liability is admitted.

A careful study of the evidence is convincing that the plaintiff has grossly exaggerated her injuries, and that the verdict of $400 is unwarrantably large. The overwhelming weight of the evidence shows that the physical injury to the plaintiff was very slight'. For [571]*571this, and for the conductor’s act of indignity, so far as it affected her sensibilities, she is entitled to recover, and for no more. If the plaintiff within 30 days after mandate is received remits all of the verdict in excess of $50, motion overruled; otherwise motion sustained.

Connellan & Connellan, for plaintiff. Libby, Robinson & Ives, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A. 209, 113 Me. 570, 1915 Me. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeney-v-cumberland-county-power-light-co-me-1915.