Sweeney v. Arrowsmith
43 Pa. Super. 268, 1910 Pa. Super. LEXIS 38
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 20, 1910·No. Appeal, No. 220·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Opinion by
After a careful examination of this record, a majority of the court are of the opinion that the conclusion reached by the court below is a correct one, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sweeney v. Arrowsmith, 43 Pa. Super. 268, 1910 Pa. Super. LEXIS 38 (Pa. Ct. App. 1910).
43 Pa. Super. 268 (Sweeney v. Arrowsmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Hoffman-Henon Co.
114 A.2d 92 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Commonwealth v. My Pop's Root Beer Co.
84 Pa. D. & C. 386 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1952)
Potter Title & Trust Co. v. International Penn Collieries Co.
68 Pa. D. & C. 591 (Somerset County Court of Common Pleas, 1949)
Commonwealth v. City Realty Co.
56 Pa. D. & C. 166 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1946)
Commonwealth v. Corner Realty Co.
41 Pa. D. & C. 236 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1941)
Citizens National Bank v. Nease
35 Pa. D. & C. 563 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1939)
Beckman v. Altoona Trust Co.
2 A.2d 826 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Davis v. Seltzer
18 Pa. D. & C. 442 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1933)
Scranton Lackawanna Trust Co. v. Scranton Lackawanna Trust Co.
165 A. 42 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Harper v. Consolidated Rubber Co.
131 A. 356 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)