Sween v. Spacemaster Building Systems, LLC

300 A.D.2d 32, 750 N.Y.S.2d 497, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11713
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 5, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered February 20, 2002, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law (Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 11, 29 [6]), since the documentary and testimonial evidence support conflicting inferences as to whether plaintiff, at the time of the alleged accident, was, in fact, a special employee of defendant (see Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553, 557). Concur — Williams, P.J., Ellerin, Rubin, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sween v. Spacemaster Building Systems, LLC, 300 A.D.2d 32, 750 N.Y.S.2d 497, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

300 A.D.2d 32 (Sween v. Spacemaster Building Systems, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sierra v. C.C. Controlled Combustion Co.
308 A.D.2d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)