Swedlow v. Swedlow
840 So. 2d 372, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3723, 2003 WL 1239981
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s determination that the husband’s disability policy was a marital asset subject to equitable distribution. See Hoffner v. Hoffner, 577 So.2d 703, 704 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Hanks v. Hanks, 553 So.2d 340, 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Bloch v. Bloch, 688 So.2d 945, 947 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). We affirm on all other issues. On remand, the sole issue for the circuit court is to increase the award of permanent alimony to the wife in light of the reclassification of the husband’s disability policy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swedlow v. Swedlow, 840 So. 2d 372, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3723, 2003 WL 1239981 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
840 So. 2d 372 (Swedlow v. Swedlow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoffner v. Hoffner
577 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Hanks v. Hanks
553 So. 2d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Bloch v. Bloch
688 So. 2d 945 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)