Swedesboro National Bank v. Richman

116 A. 926, 93 N.J. Eq. 502, 8 Stock. 502, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 325
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 9, 1922
StatusPublished

This text of 116 A. 926 (Swedesboro National Bank v. Richman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swedesboro National Bank v. Richman, 116 A. 926, 93 N.J. Eq. 502, 8 Stock. 502, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 325 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed, by Vice-Chancellor Backes in the court below.

For affirmance — The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzbnbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackersoií, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A. 926, 93 N.J. Eq. 502, 8 Stock. 502, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swedesboro-national-bank-v-richman-nj-1922.