Sweatmon v. Ocwen Federal Bank (In re Sweatmon)

Fourth Circuit

Sweatmon v. Ocwen Federal Bank (In re Sweatmon)

144 F. App'x 322, 335 B.R. 322

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 20, 2005

DocketNos. 05-1322, 05-1323

StatusPublished

This text of 144 F. App'x 322 (Sweatmon v. Ocwen Federal Bank (In re Sweatmon)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sweatmon v. Ocwen Federal Bank (In re Sweatmon), 144 F. App'x 322, 335 B.R. 322 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Janise Rose Sweatmon appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders: (1) denying her request for a continuance; (2) lifting the automatic stay and allowing a foreclosure to proceed; and (3) dismissing her bankruptcy petition with prejudice. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See In re Sweatmon, Nos. CA-05-264-PJM; CA-05-265-PJM; BK-04-24686 (D. Md. filed Mar. 17, 2005 & entered Mar. 18, 2005). We grant Sweatmon’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny her motion for appointment of counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Janise Rose Sweatmon appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders: (1) denying her request for a continuance; (2) lifting the automatic stay and allowing a foreclosure to proceed; and (3) dismissing her bankruptcy petition with prejudice. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See In re Sweatmon, Nos. CA-05-264-PJM; CA-05-265-PJM; BK-04-24686 (D. Md. filed Mar. 17, 2005 & entered Mar. 18, 2005). We grant Sweatmon’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny her motion for appointment of counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 F. App'x 322, 335 B.R. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweatmon-v-ocwen-federal-bank-in-re-sweatmon-ca4-2005.