Sweat v. Williams

402 F. App'x 809
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 30, 2010·No. No. 10-6675·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald C. Sweat appeals the district court’s order rejecting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Sweat’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants, and dismissing the action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sweat v. Williams, No. 9:09-cv-02041-HFF, 2010 WL 1755596 (D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2010). We deny Sweat’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sweat v. Williams, 402 F. App'x 809 (4th Cir. 2010).

402 F. App'x 809 (Sweat v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Redemption Cmty. Church v. City of Laurel
333 F. Supp. 3d 521 (D. Maryland, 2018)
Potomac Development Corp. v. District of Columbia
28 A.3d 531 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
Hamilton v. Mayor of Baltimore
807 F. Supp. 2d 331 (D. Maryland, 2011)