Sweat v. Williams

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 30, 2010
• Docket: 10-6675
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6675

REGINALD C. SWEAT,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KEVIN E. WILLIAMS; CURTIS BUFFORD, Lieutenant; JIMMY WHITE, Official and Individual Capacities,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (9:09-cv-02041-HFF)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 30, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald C. Sweat, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reginald C. Sweat appeals the district court’s order

rejecting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss

Sweat’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to

exhaust, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants, and

dismissing the action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Sweat v. Williams, No. 9:09-cv-02041-HFF

(D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2010). We deny Sweat’s motion to appoint

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED