Sweat v. Cook

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6595

REGINALD C. SWEAT,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DORRIS COOK, Head Nurse, Individual and Official Capacity; HARRY MCKENN, Dr., Individual and Official Capacity,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (9:09-cv-01255-HFF)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 30, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald C. Sweat, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reginald C. Sweat appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Sweat v. Cook,

No. 9:09-cv-01255-HFF (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 2010). We deny Sweat’s

motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED