Sweat & Mattox v. Georgia Naval Stores Co.
59 S.E. 273, 129 Ga. 571, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 513
Opinion
Where a bill of exceptions, in a ease in which an application for an injunction was granted, recites that it was presented “within thirty days from the passing of the order as aforesaid and. the trial of said case,” and it does not appear from either the record or the bill of exceptions that the latter was tendered within twenty days from the rendition of the decision, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error. Civil Code, §5540; Evans v. State, 112 Ga. 763.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sweat & Mattox v. Georgia Naval Stores Co., 59 S.E. 273, 129 Ga. 571, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 513 (Ga. 1907).
59 S.E. 273 (Sweat & Mattox v. Georgia Naval Stores Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Corley v. Crompton-Highland Mills Inc.
39 S.E.2d 861 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Dodd v. State
177 S.E. 832 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Pettitt v. Henson
177 S.E. 355 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Wallace v. State
84 S.E. 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Curtis v. Town of Mansfield
132 Ga. 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)