Swearingen v. Pretzer
This text of 273 So. 3d 1196 (Swearingen v. Pretzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Petitioners having failed to demonstrate entitlement to either certiorari relief or prohibition relief, the petition for writ of certiorari and for writ of prohibition is dismissed.
Wolf, J., concurs; Wetherell, J., concurs in result with opinion; Makar, J., dissents with opinion.
Wetherell, J., concurring in result.
I concur in the dismissal of this case because the order challenged in the petition is properly reviewed by appeal under rule 9.130(a)(3)(B) and this case is duplicative *1197of the earlier-filed and still-pending appeal filed by these same petitioners challenging the same order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 So. 3d 1196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swearingen-v-pretzer-fladistctapp-2019.