Swayze v. Huntington
91 A. 1071, 83 N.J. Eq. 335, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 383
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Howell.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Rahsci-i, Bogert, Yreden.burgh, White, Heppenheimer — 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swayze v. Huntington, 91 A. 1071, 83 N.J. Eq. 335, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 383 (N.J. 1914).
91 A. 1071 (Swayze v. Huntington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Canova v. Canova
368 A.2d 971 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Dierksen v. Albert
254 A.2d 809 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Mitchell v. Mitchell
46 A.2d 85 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Woolf
42 A.2d 866 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Hanstein v. Kelly
24 A.2d 386 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Verdi v. Jefferson Trust Co.
198 A. 543 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1938)
Salmon v. Pittenger
193 A. 843 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Pabst v. Haman
185 A. 500 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Zimmerman v. Nauhauser
183 A. 820 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Parker v. Colonial Building-Loan Assn.
161 A. 353 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)
Nat., C., Lyndhurst v. Rutherford Trust Co.
157 A. 142 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)
Kirkpatrick v. Kirkpatrick
151 A. 48 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
Page v. Afflerbach
140 A. 792 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)
Wright v. Sanger
137 A. 657 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)
Crane v. Crane
135 A. 782 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)