Swayngim v. Sampson
112 S.E.2d 733, 252 N.C. 69, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 382
Opinion
The evidence was conflicting. There was an issue of fact for the jury which was resolved by the twelve in plaintiff’s favor. The jury might well have decided the issue differently, but we see no legal ground for disturbing the verdict. All assignments of error relate to the charge of the court. When read contextually, the charge is found to be free of prejudicial error. Weavil v. Trading Post, 245 N.C. 106, 115, 95 S.E. 2d 533; Taylor Co. v. Highway Commission, 250 N.C. 533, 539, 109 S.E. 2d 243.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swayngim v. Sampson, 112 S.E.2d 733, 252 N.C. 69, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 382 (N.C. 1960).
112 S.E.2d 733 (Swayngim v. Sampson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
John R. Taylor Co. v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission
109 S.E.2d 243 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Weavil v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.
95 S.E.2d 533 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)