Swayngim v. Sampson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Swayngim v. Sampson

112 S.E.2d 733, 252 N.C. 69, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 382

DecidedFebruary 24, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E.2d 733 (Swayngim v. Sampson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swayngim v. Sampson, 112 S.E.2d 733, 252 N.C. 69, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 382 (N.C. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee CuRiam.

The evidence was conflicting. There was an issue of fact for the jury which was resolved by the twelve in plaintiff’s favor. The jury might well have decided the issue differently, but we see no legal ground for disturbing the verdict. All assignments of error relate to the charge of the court. When read contextually, the charge is found to be free of prejudicial error. Weavil v. Trading Post, 245 N.C. 106, 115, 95 S.E. 2d 533; Taylor Co. v. Highway Commission, 250 N.C. 533, 539, 109 S.E. 2d 243.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee CuRiam.

The evidence was conflicting. There was an issue of fact for the jury which was resolved by the twelve in plaintiff’s favor. The jury might well have decided the issue differently, but we see no legal ground for disturbing the verdict. All assignments of error relate to the charge of the court. When read contextually, the charge is found to be free of prejudicial error. Weavil v. Trading Post, 245 N.C. 106, 115, 95 S.E. 2d 533; Taylor Co. v. Highway Commission, 250 N.C. 533, 539, 109 S.E. 2d 243.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 S.E.2d 733, 252 N.C. 69, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swayngim-v-sampson-nc-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack