Swarz v. Loeffler

289 U.S. 706, 53 S. Ct. 692
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 8, 1933·No. No. 906·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied. The appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a) Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13,1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swarz v. Loeffler, 289 U.S. 706, 53 S. Ct. 692 (1933).

289 U.S. 706 (Swarz v. Loeffler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Urland v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals
822 F.2d 1268 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Carr-Consolidated Biscuit Company v. Moore
125 F. Supp. 423 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1954)
Carr-Consolidated Biscuit Co. v. Moore
125 F. Supp. 423 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1954)
Newtown Creek Towing Co. v. The Christine Moran
115 F. Supp. 244 (S.D. New York, 1953)
Urbish v. City of Dallas
260 S.W.2d 148 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1953)
City of Dallas v. Crippen
171 F.2d 526 (Fifth Circuit, 1948)
Strom v. Peikes
123 F.2d 1003 (Second Circuit, 1941)
In Re Beardsley
38 F. Supp. 799 (D. Maryland, 1941)
Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. Joyce
97 F.2d 973 (Third Circuit, 1938)
United States v. Cote
95 F.2d 80 (First Circuit, 1938)
Hotel Lafayette, Inc. v. Pickford
85 F.2d 710 (D.C. Circuit, 1936)
Ingram v. Coos County, Or
71 F.2d 889 (Ninth Circuit, 1934)