Swartzman v. County of Chautauqua

152 A.D.2d 970, 544 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9874
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 1989·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and complaint dismissed as against defendant county. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying the county’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs’ failure to plead compliance with the requirement of prior written notice of the existence of snow and ice upon the highway requires dismissal of the complaint (see, Highway Law § 139 [2]; Local Laws, 1985, No. 3 of County of Chautauqua; Banta v County of Erie, 134 AD2d [971]*971839, 840; Powell v Gates-Chili Cent. School Dist., 50 AD2d 1079, 1080). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swartzman v. County of Chautauqua, 152 A.D.2d 970, 544 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 970 (Swartzman v. County of Chautauqua) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delcamp v. Village of Brocton
270 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Gilmore v. City of Rochester
163 Misc. 2d 660 (New York Supreme Court, 1995)