Swartzlander v. Forms-Rite Business Forms & Printing Service, Inc.
582 N.E.2d 597, 78 N.Y.2d 1060, 576 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4217
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (174 AD2d 971).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swartzlander v. Forms-Rite Business Forms & Printing Service, Inc., 582 N.E.2d 597, 78 N.Y.2d 1060, 576 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4217 (N.Y. 1991).
582 N.E.2d 597 (Swartzlander v. Forms-Rite Business Forms & Printing Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Swartzlander v. FORMS-RITE BUS. FORMS & PRINTING SERV., INC.
78 N.Y.2d 1060 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)