Swartzbaugh v. Diversified Health Services of Nebraska, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Swartzbaugh v. Diversified Health Services of Nebraska, Inc.

450 N.W.2d 660, 234 Neb. 256, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 15

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided January 26, 1990·No. No. 88-186·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having considered the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we reverse the judgment of the district court because of an erroneous finding of fact and conclusion of law, and we remand the cause with directions to sustain plaintiff’s motion for partial summary [257] judgment and for further proceedings to determine the amount of the renewal commissions due.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Having considered the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we reverse the judgment of the district court because of an erroneous finding of fact and conclusion of law, and we remand the cause with directions to sustain plaintiff’s motion for partial summary [257] judgment and for further proceedings to determine the amount of the renewal commissions due.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Swartzbaugh v. Diversified Health Services of Nebraska, Inc., 450 N.W.2d 660, 234 Neb. 256, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 15 (Neb. 1990).

Pincite

450 N.W.2d 660 (Swartzbaugh v. Diversified Health Services of Nebraska, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.