Swartzbaugh v. Diversified Health Services of Nebraska, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Swartzbaugh v. Diversified Health Services of Nebraska, Inc.

450 N.W.2d 660, 234 Neb. 256, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 15

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 26, 1990

DocketNo. 88-186

StatusPublished

This text of 450 N.W.2d 660 (Swartzbaugh v. Diversified Health Services of Nebraska, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swartzbaugh v. Diversified Health Services of Nebraska, Inc., 450 N.W.2d 660, 234 Neb. 256, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 15 (Neb. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having considered the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we reverse the judgment of the district court because of an erroneous finding of fact and conclusion of law, and we remand the cause with directions to sustain plaintiff’s motion for partial summary [257]*257judgment and for further proceedings to determine the amount of the renewal commissions due.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Having considered the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we reverse the judgment of the district court because of an erroneous finding of fact and conclusion of law, and we remand the cause with directions to sustain plaintiff’s motion for partial summary [257]*257judgment and for further proceedings to determine the amount of the renewal commissions due.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

450 N.W.2d 660, 234 Neb. 256, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swartzbaugh-v-diversified-health-services-of-nebraska-inc-neb-1990.