Swartz v. Swartz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Swartz v. Swartz

691 So. 2d 3, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653, 1997 WL 91414

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 5, 1997

DocketNo. 96-2537

StatusPublished

This text of 691 So. 2d 3 (Swartz v. Swartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swartz v. Swartz, 691 So. 2d 3, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653, 1997 WL 91414 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Robbie v. Robbie, 591 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991 )(Florida Patient’s Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985) inapplicable to temporary fee requests in dissolution eases) (trial court has broad discretion in temporary fee awards); Nudelman v. [4]*4Nudelman, 542 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)(Rowe inapplicable to temporary fee requests in dissolution cases); see Conner v. Conner, 439 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983)(triai court determines reasonableness of fee).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Robbie v. Robbie, 591 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991 )(Florida Patient’s Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985) inapplicable to temporary fee requests in dissolution eases) (trial court has broad discretion in temporary fee awards); Nudelman v. [4]*4Nudelman, 542 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)(Rowe inapplicable to temporary fee requests in dissolution cases); see Conner v. Conner, 439 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983)(triai court determines reasonableness of fee).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

691 So. 2d 3, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653, 1997 WL 91414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swartz-v-swartz-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack