Swartz v. Swartz
691 So. 2d 3, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653, 1997 WL 91414
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Swartz v. Swartz. Read the opinion of the Court — 691 So. 2d 2 →
Opinion
Affirmed. Robbie v. Robbie, 591 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991 )(Florida Patient’s Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985) inapplicable to temporary fee requests in dissolution eases) (trial court has broad discretion in temporary fee awards); Nudelman v. [4]*4Nudelman, 542 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)(Rowe inapplicable to temporary fee requests in dissolution cases); see Conner v. Conner, 439 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983)(triai court determines reasonableness of fee).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swartz v. Swartz, 691 So. 2d 3, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653, 1997 WL 91414 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
691 So. 2d 3 (Swartz v. Swartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nudelman v. Nudelman
542 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Robbie v. Robbie
591 So. 2d 1006 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Conner v. Conner
439 So. 2d 887 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe
472 So. 2d 1145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)