Swartz v. Householder

2016 Ohio 5817, 81 N.E.3d 1221, 150 Ohio St. 3d 341
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 2016
DocketNos. 2014-1208 and 2014-1209
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2016 Ohio 5817 (Swartz v. Householder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swartz v. Householder, 2016 Ohio 5817, 81 N.E.3d 1221, 150 Ohio St. 3d 341 (Ohio 2016).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgments of the court of appeals are reversed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., 149 Ohio St.3d 512, 2016-Ohio-5796, 76 N.E.3d 1089, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, 149 Ohio St.3d 282, 2016-Ohio-5793, 74 N.E.3d 427.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

West v. Bode
2019 Ohio 4092 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
Jefferis Real Estate Oil & Gas Holdings, LLC v. Schaffner Law Offices, L.P.
109 N.E.3d 1265 (Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Belmont County, 2018)
Swartz v. Householder (Slip Opinion)
2016 Ohio 5817 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 Ohio 5817, 81 N.E.3d 1221, 150 Ohio St. 3d 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swartz-v-householder-ohio-2016.