Swartz v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Swartz v. Director of Revenue

502 S.W.3d 754, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2016 WL 6236647

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 2016·No. WD78677·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jerry J. Swartz. appeals from the trial court’s judgment suspending his driving [755] privileges pursuant to section 302.525. Swartz contends that the trial court erred in upholding the Director of Revenue’s (“Director”) suspension of his. driving privileges because there was no probable cause to arrest him for driving while intoxicated as “the only indicia of intoxication was bloodshot and watery eyes and the moderate odor of alcohol.” Because a. published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jerry J. Swartz. appeals from the trial court’s judgment suspending his driving [755] privileges pursuant to section 302.525. Swartz contends that the trial court erred in upholding the Director of Revenue’s (“Director”) suspension of his. driving privileges because there was no probable cause to arrest him for driving while intoxicated as “the only indicia of intoxication was bloodshot and watery eyes and the moderate odor of alcohol.” Because a. published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Swartz v. Director of Revenue, 502 S.W.3d 754, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2016 WL 6236647 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

502 S.W.3d 754 (Swartz v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.