Swartwout v. Hoage

New York Supreme Court

Swartwout v. Hoage

16 Johns. 3

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1819

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Johns. 3 (Swartwout v. Hoage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swartwout v. Hoage, 16 Johns. 3 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We perceive so great a laxity in affidavits to change the venue, that we think it necessary to adopt a stricter rule than has hitherto been observed in this respect; [4]*4and shall require the party, who swears to a defence, to statei <t as he is advised by counsel.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We perceive so great a laxity in affidavits to change the venue, that we think it necessary to adopt a stricter rule than has hitherto been observed in this respect; [4]*4and shall require the party, who swears to a defence, to statei <t as he is advised by counsel.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Johns. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swartwout-v-hoage-nysupct-1819.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack