Swartwout v. Hoage
16 Johns. 3
Opinion
We perceive so great a laxity in affidavits to change the venue, that we think it necessary to adopt a stricter rule than has hitherto been observed in this respect; [4] and shall require the party, who swears to a defence, to statei <t as he is advised by counsel.”
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swartwout v. Hoage, 16 Johns. 3 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).
16 Johns. 3 (Swartwout v. Hoage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brittan v. Peabody
4 Hill & Den. 61 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)