Swarts v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Swarts v. Mahoney

123 A.D.2d 520, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60281

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 26, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly concluded that petitioner had no standing as an aggrieved candidate. The challenge herein was based upon alleged infirmities relating to the internal affairs of a political party, rather than a failure to comply with the legislative mandates of the Election Law (see, Matter of Liepshutz v Palmateer, 112 AD2d 1098, affd 65 NY2d 963). We have considered the other issue raised and find it to be without merit. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Election Law.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 21, 1986.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly concluded that petitioner had no standing as an aggrieved candidate. The challenge herein was based upon alleged infirmities relating to the internal affairs of a political party, rather than a failure to comply with the legislative mandates of the Election Law (see, Matter of Liepshutz v Palmateer, 112 AD2d 1098, affd 65 NY2d 963). We have considered the other issue raised and find it to be without merit. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Election Law.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 21, 1986.)

Swarts v. Mahoney, 123 A.D.2d 520, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60281 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

123 A.D.2d 520 (Swarts v. Mahoney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related