Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. v. Seagrave Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
542 F.2d 1008, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6729
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 12, 1976·No. 76-1511·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the Court’s own motion and pursuant to Rule 9(a), the appeal is dismissed. This Court is without jurisdiction to hear appeals from a decision of a United States Magistrate. See Reciprocal Exchange v. Noland, 542 F.2d 462 (8th Cir. 1976); United States v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678 (8th Cir. 1974); 9 J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 110.01 (2d ed. 1973).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. v. Seagrave Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, 542 F.2d 1008, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6729 (8th Cir. 1976).
542 F.2d 1008 (Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. v. Seagrave Corporation, a Delaware Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harding v. Kurco, Inc.
603 F.2d 813 (Tenth Circuit, 1979)
Metric & Multistandard Components Corporation v. Metric's Inc.
600 F.2d 1237 (Eighth Circuit, 1979)
Willis M. Duryea, Jr. v. The Third Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis, a National Banking Association, Bruce Winslow, John Doe and Mary Roe
602 F.2d 809 (Third Circuit, 1979)
Sick v. City of Buffalo
574 F.2d 689 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Joseph Sick v. City Of Buffalo
574 F.2d 689 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. v. Seagrave Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
561 F.2d 171 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)