Swanson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Swanson v. State

490 So. 2d 242, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1442, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8867

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 27, 1986

DocketNo. 86-1223

StatusPublished

This text of 490 So. 2d 242 (Swanson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swanson v. State, 490 So. 2d 242, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1442, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8867 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. However, the record does not justify that portion of the trial court’s order which holds that appellant “shall not file any other pro se motions with this court.” Accordingly, we strike that provision. This opinion should not be construed as affecting the time limitations recently included in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. However, the record does not justify that portion of the trial court’s order which holds that appellant “shall not file any other pro se motions with this court.” Accordingly, we strike that provision. This opinion should not be construed as affecting the time limitations recently included in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 So. 2d 242, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1442, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swanson-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.