Swanson v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided October 4, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-1990·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RUTHIE MICHELLE SWANSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1990 (BAH) ) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendant moves to dismiss this action under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure on the grounds of sovereign immunity and mootness. United States’ Motion to

Dismiss, ECF No. 11. By Order of August 7, 2012, ECF No. 12, Plaintiff was advised about her

obligation to respond to Defendant’s motion by September 12, 2012, and the consequence of

dismissal if she did not file a response. Plaintiff has neither filed a response nor requested

additional time to do so. The Court therefore will grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss as

conceded and will dismiss this action. See LCvR 7(b) (“If [an opposing] memorandum is not filed

within the prescribed time, the Court may treat the motion a conceded.”); Twelve John Does v.

District of Columbia, 117 F.3d 571, 577 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (“Where the district court relies on the

absence of a response as a basis for treating a motion as conceded, [the District of Columbia

Circuit] honor[s] its enforcement” of the local rule). A separate Order accompanies this

Memorandum Opinion.

/s/ Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: October 4, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swanson v. Internal Revenue Service, (D.D.C. 2012).

Swanson v. Internal Revenue Service (Swanson v. Internal Revenue Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related