Swanson v. Cravens
This text of 30 S.E. 642 (Swanson v. Cravens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where the defendant, in his affidavit of illegality to the foreclosure of a mortgage by the mortgagee on personalty, admits the execution of the note and mortgage, and sets up a partial failure of consideration as his only defense to such foreclosure, the burden of proof is cast upon him; and, upon his claiming the right to open and conclude before the introduction of any testimony, it was error in the court to deny him this privilege. Montgomery v. Hunt, 93 Ga. [472]*472438. It was, therefore, error for the judge of the superior court to overrule the certiorari complaining of such ruling by the justice of the peace.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 S.E. 642, 105 Ga. 471, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swanson-v-cravens-ga-1898.