Swanson v. City of Bloomington

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Swanson v. City of Bloomington

398 N.W.2d 567, 1987 Minn. LEXIS 1344

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 16, 1987

DocketNo. C3-86-782

StatusPublished

This text of 398 N.W.2d 567 (Swanson v. City of Bloomington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swanson v. City of Bloomington, 398 N.W.2d 567, 1987 Minn. LEXIS 1344 (Mich. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of the City of Bloomington for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amicus application of Vanee B. Grannis, Jr., on behalf of interested cities and other municipal entities be, and the same is, granted. Said brief shall be served and filed simultaneously with that of the appellant.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request of the City of Bloomington to serve and file an amicus curiae brief in the above-entitled matter be, and the same is, granted. Said brief shall be served and filed simultaneously with that of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of the City of Bloomington for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amicus application of Vanee B. Grannis, Jr., on behalf of interested cities and other municipal entities be, and the same is, granted. Said brief shall be served and filed simultaneously with that of the appellant.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request of the City of Bloomington to serve and file an amicus curiae brief in the above-entitled matter be, and the same is, granted. Said brief shall be served and filed simultaneously with that of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

398 N.W.2d 567, 1987 Minn. LEXIS 1344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swanson-v-city-of-bloomington-minn-1987.