Swanson v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Swanson v. Board of Education

305 A.D.2d 610, 759 N.Y.S.2d 371

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 305 A.D.2d 610 (Swanson v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swanson v. Board of Education, 305 A.D.2d 610, 759 N.Y.S.2d 371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Chancellor of the Board of Education of the City of New York terminating the petitioner’s certificate and license to teach in the public schools of the Board of Education of the City of New York, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated October 29, 2001, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, in the circumstances of this case, she was not denied due process (see Matter of Climent v Board of Educ. of Community School Dist. No. 22, 288 AD2d 312 [2001]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, Friedmann and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Chancellor of the Board of Education of the City of New York terminating the petitioner’s certificate and license to teach in the public schools of the Board of Education of the City of New York, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated October 29, 2001, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, in the circumstances of this case, she was not denied due process (see Matter of Climent v Board of Educ. of Community School Dist. No. 22, 288 AD2d 312 [2001]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, Friedmann and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 610, 759 N.Y.S.2d 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swanson-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack