Swanson v. Beilman
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
SARAH L. SWANSON,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D15-2901
LOLITA M. BEILMAN,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 12, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Charles M. Holcomb, Judge.
Charles W. Hall, DeeAnn J. McLemore and Mark D. Tinker, of Banker Lopez Gassler P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant.
Marjorie Gadarian Graham, of Marjorie Gadarian Graham, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens and Douglas R. Beam, Melbourne, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Sarah L. Swanson appeals the trial court’s order granting a new trial on damages
after she rejected an additur in a personal injury lawsuit arising from an automobile
accident. We affirm. However, because the jury found the plaintiff below, Lolita M.
Beilman, did not sustain a permanent injury, the new trial shall be limited to economic
damages only. See § 627.737(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swanson v. Beilman (Swanson v. Beilman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.