Swanson v. Beilman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Swanson v. Beilman

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 2017

Docket5D15-2901

StatusPublished

This text of Swanson v. Beilman (Swanson v. Beilman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swanson v. Beilman, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SARAH L. SWANSON,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-2901

LOLITA M. BEILMAN,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 12, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Charles M. Holcomb, Judge.

Charles W. Hall, DeeAnn J. McLemore and Mark D. Tinker, of Banker Lopez Gassler P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Marjorie Gadarian Graham, of Marjorie Gadarian Graham, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens and Douglas R. Beam, Melbourne, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Sarah L. Swanson appeals the trial court’s order granting a new trial on damages

after she rejected an additur in a personal injury lawsuit arising from an automobile

accident. We affirm. However, because the jury found the plaintiff below, Lolita M.

Beilman, did not sustain a permanent injury, the new trial shall be limited to economic

damages only. See § 627.737(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI