Swanson Group mfg.llc v. Salazar

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SWANSON GROUP MFG. LLC, et at., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 10-1843 (RJL) ) KEN SALAZAR, et at., ) ) ) Defendants. )

~ORDER June Zb, 2013 [## 41, 44, 45]

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 41] is

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; it is further

ORDERED that defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 45] is

ORDERED that defendant-intervenors' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

[Dkt. # 44] is DENIED; it is further

ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs on Counts One and Two

of the Amended Complaint; it is further

ORDERED that defendant Ken Salazar and/or his successors shall sell or offer for

sale the declared annual sustained yield capacity of timber for the Medford and Roseburg

districts for each year; it is further ORDERED that the Owl Estimation Methodology is set aside and shall not be

used by defendants Ken Salazar, Tom Vilsack, and/or their successors unless and until the

methodology is submitted to the rulemaking procedures of 5 U.S.C. § 553; it is further

ORDERED that Count Three of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as

moot; and it is further

ORDERED that Counts Four and Five of the Amended Complaint are

DISMISSED as conceded.

SO ORDERED.

RICHARD . N United States District Judge