Swanson

Court of Claims

Swanson

166 Ct. Cl. 597, 1964 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 110, 1964 WL 1590

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMay 18, 1964

DocketNo. 6-63

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 Ct. Cl. 597 (Swanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swanson, 166 Ct. Cl. 597, 1964 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 110, 1964 WL 1590 (cc 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Civilian pay. — Plaintiff, an employee of International Cooperation Administration, lost his position when his agency was abolished. He was given a time-limited position with the Agency for International Development, which agency had been established by the Secretary of State on order of the President pursuant to section 621(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of September 4,1961,75 Stat. 460. Upon termination of the temporary position with AID, plaintiff sued to recover his back pay on the ground that his rights under section 12 of the Veterans Preference Act of 1944 had been violated when the functions of ICA were allegedly transferred to AID.

The case came before the court on plaintiff’s and defendant’s cross motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with oral argument, and based on the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 75 Stat. 445, and Myers v. Hollister, 226 F. 2d 346 (C.A.D.C. 1955), the court concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to recover and the petition was dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civilian pay. — Plaintiff, an employee of International Cooperation Administration, lost his position when his agency was abolished. He was given a time-limited position with the Agency for International Development, which agency had been established by the Secretary of State on order of the President pursuant to section 621(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of September 4,1961,75 Stat. 460. Upon termination of the temporary position with AID, plaintiff sued to recover his back pay on the ground that his rights under section 12 of the Veterans Preference Act of 1944 had been violated when the functions of ICA were allegedly transferred to AID.

The case came before the court on plaintiff’s and defendant’s cross motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with oral argument, and based on the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 75 Stat. 445, and Myers v. Hollister, 226 F. 2d 346 (C.A.D.C. 1955), the court concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to recover and the petition was dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 Ct. Cl. 597, 1964 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 110, 1964 WL 1590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swanson-cc-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack