Swann v. Swann
This text of 95 S.E.2d 573 (Swann v. Swann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was evidence sufficient to support the jury’s answer to each of the issues submitted. Hence, the motions for judgment of nonsuit were properly overruled.
[236]*236The charge of the trial court was not included in the record on appeal and is presumed to be correct. Hatcher v. Clayton, 242 N.C. 450, 88 S.E. 2d 104.
Each of appellant’s assignments of error has been carefully considered. None shows prejudicial error or requires particular discussion. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 S.E.2d 573, 245 N.C. 234, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swann-v-swann-nc-1956.