Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Swann v. State

Swann v. State

113 S.E. 38, 28 Ga. App. 771, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 851
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 12, 1922
Docket13601
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 S.E. 38 (Swann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swann v. State, 113 S.E. 38, 28 Ga. App. 771, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 851 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction. The only special- ground of the motion for a new trial is based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, the material part of which was hearsay and inadmissible; and, moreover, this alleged evidence is not such as would likely cause a different result should a new trial be granted. The court therefore did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

•Judgment affirmed.

Broyles,. C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents. W. L. Nix, for plaintiff in error. W. O. Dean, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richards v. State
262 S.E.2d 469 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 38, 28 Ga. App. 771, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swann-v-state-gactapp-1922.