Swann v. Rabb

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Swann v. Rabb

91 So. 441, 150 La. 1025

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 18, 1922

DocketNo. 24814

StatusPublished

This text of 91 So. 441 (Swann v. Rabb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swann v. Rabb, 91 So. 441, 150 La. 1025 (La. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

By Division A, composed of Chief Justice PROVOSTY and Justices OVERTON and LECHE.

PROVOSTY, C. J.

This suit is based on a state of facts exactly similar to that in the case of Duke v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth (No. 24784; La.) 91 South. 440,¹ this day decided, and involves the same legal propositions. Eor the reasons there stated, judgment affirmed.

Rehearing refused by Division B, composed of Justices O’NIELL, LAND, and BAKER.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By Division A, composed of Chief Justice PROVOSTY and Justices OVERTON and LECHE.

PROVOSTY, C. J.

This suit is based on a state of facts exactly similar to that in the case of Duke v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth (No. 24784; La.) 91 South. 440,¹ this day decided, and involves the same legal propositions. Eor the reasons there stated, judgment affirmed.

Rehearing refused by Division B, composed of Justices O’NIELL, LAND, and BAKER.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 So. 441, 150 La. 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swann-v-rabb-la-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack