Swann v. Rabb

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Swann v. Rabb

91 So. 441, 150 La. 1025

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 18, 1922·No. No. 24814·Published

Opinion

By Division A, composed of Chief Justice PROVOSTY and Justices OVERTON and LECHE.

PROVOSTY, C. J.

This suit is based on a state of facts exactly similar to that in the case of Duke v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth (No. 24784; La.) 91 South. 440,¹ this day decided, and involves the same legal propositions. Eor the reasons there stated, judgment affirmed.

Rehearing refused by Division B, composed of Justices O’NIELL, LAND, and BAKER.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By Division A, composed of Chief Justice PROVOSTY and Justices OVERTON and LECHE.

PROVOSTY, C. J.

This suit is based on a state of facts exactly similar to that in the case of Duke v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth (No. 24784; La.) 91 South. 440,¹ this day decided, and involves the same legal propositions. Eor the reasons there stated, judgment affirmed.

Rehearing refused by Division B, composed of Justices O’NIELL, LAND, and BAKER.

Swann v. Rabb, 91 So. 441, 150 La. 1025 (La. 1922).

Pincite

91 So. 441 (Swann v. Rabb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related