Swann v. Adams

263 F. Supp. 225, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7344
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1967
DocketCiv. 186-62
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 263 F. Supp. 225 (Swann v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swann v. Adams, 263 F. Supp. 225, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7344 (S.D. Fla. 1967).

Opinion

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

PER CURIAM.

The Court having heard oral arguments and considered the briefs of the parties and amici curiae makes the fol *226 lowing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

Findings of Fact

1. House Bill 17X (66), Chapter 1, Florida Laws 1966, was found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 9, 1967, (385 U.S.-, 87 S.Ct. 569, 17 L.Ed.2d 501).

2. Senate Bill 8X (67) has variations in the Senate from districts which are 9.20% under represented to 10.56% over represented, or a total variation of 19.-76% from the largest Senatorial districts to the smallest Senatorial district. In the House of Representatives the variation is from three districts which are 9.98% under represented to one district which is 16.15% over represented, or a total variation from the largest to the smallest district of 26.12%.

3. A weighted voting plan proposed by the Secretary of State of the State of Florida provided for the weight of the vote of each member in the Florida Legislature under House Bill 17X to be determined by taking the percentage of the average population per member as it related to the total state population and by applying that percentage to the total membership of each body.

4. A plan was proposed to apportion the Legislature on the basis of population estimates for the year 1965.

5. Proposals for at large elections and various plans rearranging House and Senate districts which would increase or decrease the size of the Legislature were submitted.

Conclusions of Law

1. The Court has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter.

2. The State has failed to present, and the Court is unable to articulate, acceptable reasons for variations among the populations of the various districts in the plans of the Legislature for apportionment.

3. Proposals for at large elections and for weighted or fractional voting are impractical and of doubtful validity and are therefore rejected.

4. Proposals for apportionment based upon population estimates for the year 1965 are rejected, because the evidence of their accuracy is insufficient and, further, because the use of the Federal decennial census is provided by Section 5, Article VII, of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The Federal decennial census meets the minimal requirements of the equal protection clause.

5. Judicial apportionment of the Florida Legislature is required. The Legislature of the State of Florida shall be reconstituted and reapportioned as set forth in the plan of apportionment in this Court’s order of February 8, 1967, providing for 48 Senate districts and 119 House of Representative districts.

6. The judicial apportionment plan contains no more than de minimis departures from population equality. Such variations as exist result from and are required by the desirability for maintaining compactness and contiguity and the following of county lines as the boundaries of legislative districts. There are no residence requirements within particular counties of a district or grandfather clauses.

7. To implement the plan of apportionment primary and general elections shall be held in time for the reapportioned and reconstituted Legislature to meet in its regular session on April 4, 1967.

8. Terms of all legislators elected in 1967 shall expire with the general elections of 1968.

9. The Legislature, as reapportioned and reconstituted, may exercise all of the valid powers of a Florida Legislature granted by the Florida Constitution or otherwise.

FINAL JUDGMENT

It is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed :

1. The Legislature of the State of Florida is hereby reconstituted and reap *227 portioned into and by the creation of 48 Senatorial districts and 119 House of Representatives districts; that is to say:

(a) In the Senate the districts shall be numbered, defined and composed as follows:

District No. Counties No. of Seats

1, 2 Escambia, Santa Rosa 2

3-5 Okaloosa, Walton, Holmes, Washington, Calhoun, Leon, Gadsden, Bay, Jackson 3

6 Columbia, Suwannee, Hamilton, Madison, Taylor, Jefferson, Wakulla, Franklin, Gulf, Liberty 1

7 Gilchrist, Alachua, Bradford, Levy, Dixie, Lafayette 1

8-12 Duval, Baker, Union, St. Johns, Nassau 5

13 Clay, Flagler, Putnam, Marion 1

14, 15 Citrus, Hernando, Lake, Sumter, Volusia 2

16-18 Orange, Seminole 3

19-22 Pinellas, Pasco 4

23-26 Hillsborough 4

27, 28 Osceola, Polk 2

29, 30 Brevard, Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, St. Lucie 2

31 Manatee, Hardee, Highlands 1

32 Charlotte, DeSoto, Sarasota 1

33-35 Glades, Hendry, Lee, Palm Beach 3

36-39 Broward, Collier, Monroe 4

40-48 Dade 9

(b) In the House of Representatives the districts shall be numbered, defined and composed as follows:

1-4 Escambia 4

5-7 Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Holmes, Washington 3

8, 9 Bay, Gulf, Calhoun 2

10, 11 Liberty, Jackson, Gadsden 2

12,13 Franklin, Wakulla, Leon 2

14 Jefferson, Madison, Taylor, Lafayette 1

15 Suwannee, Dixie, Hamilton, Gil Christ, Levy 1

16, 17 Nassau, Baker, Columbia, Bradford, Union, Clay 2

18-28 Duval 11

29-31 Alachua, Marion 3

32-34 Putnam, Flagler, St. Johns, Lake 3

*228 District No. Counties No. of Seats

35-37 Volusia 3

38-45 Orange, Seminole 8

46-54 Pinellas 9

55-59 Polk, Sumter 5

60-70 Hillsborough, Citru?, Pasco, Hernando 11

71-74 Brevard, Osceola, Indian River, Okeechobee 4

75 St. Lucie 1

76-81 Martin, Palm Beach 6

82-89 Broward 8

90-111 Dade 22

112-114 Collier, Glades, Hendry, Lee, Monroe 3

115,116 Hardee, Manatee 2

117-119 DeSoto, Highlands, Charlotte, Sarasota 3

2. There shall be primary and general elections in all of the districts under the foregoing reapportionment, including those districts where no changes are made in boundaries or numbers of legislators.

3. The defendant Tom Adams, as Secretary of State of the State of Florida and Supervisor of State Elections, is directed to order primary and general elections in all legislative districts as soon as may be reasonably done. Such primary and general elections shall be held in accordance with all constitutional and statutory provisions governing elections in Florida not in conflict with this judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176
83 So. 3d 597 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
In Re Constitutionality of Resolution 1987
817 So. 2d 819 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Gonzalez v. Monterey County, Cal.
808 F. Supp. 727 (N.D. California, 1992)
In Re Apportionment Law, Etc.
414 So. 2d 1040 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1980
Wallace v. House
377 F. Supp. 1192 (W.D. Louisiana, 1974)
Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. Beens
406 U.S. 187 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Rodriguez v. San Antonio Independent School District
337 F. Supp. 280 (W.D. Texas, 1972)
Burns v. Gill
316 F. Supp. 1285 (D. Hawaii, 1970)
Gunderson v. Adams
328 F. Supp. 584 (S.D. Florida, 1970)
Jackson v. Consolidated Government of City of Jacksonville
225 So. 2d 497 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
West v. Moore
305 F. Supp. 683 (W.D. North Carolina, 1969)
Jackson v. Consolidated Government
31 Fla. Supp. 151 (Duval County Circuit Court, 1968)
Gong v. Kirk
278 F. Supp. 133 (S.D. Florida, 1967)
Iannucci v. Board of Supervisors
229 N.E.2d 195 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 F. Supp. 225, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swann-v-adams-flsd-1967.