Swann & Holtsinger Co. v. City of West Tampa
83 So. 293, 78 Fla. 392, 1919 Fla. LEXIS 479
Opinion
— This chancery cause coming on for final hearing and having been considered, the court is of opinion that error was committed in sustaining exceptions to portions of the answer that are not wholly irrelevant. See Bush v. Adams, 22 Fla. 177; Trustees Internal Improvement Fund v. Root, 63 Fla. 666, 58 South. Rep. 371; Jones v. Hiller, 65 Fla. 532, 62 South. Rep. 583. It is therefore ordered and decreed that the order appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swann & Holtsinger Co. v. City of West Tampa, 83 So. 293, 78 Fla. 392, 1919 Fla. LEXIS 479 (Fla. 1919).
83 So. 293 (Swann & Holtsinger Co. v. City of West Tampa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bush v. Adams
22 Fla. 177 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1886)
Trustees Internal Improvement Fund v. Root
63 Fla. 666 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1912)
Jones v. Hiller
62 So. 583 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1913)