Swann ex rel. Estate Bank v. Scholfield
23 F. Cas. 515, 2 D.C. 140, 2 Cranch 140
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided April 15, 1817·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
instructed the jury, that after the note was taken up by Bruce, its negotiability ceased, and he could not assign his right of action at law to the plaintiff, so as to enable him to sue in his own name.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swann ex rel. Estate Bank v. Scholfield, 23 F. Cas. 515, 2 D.C. 140, 2 Cranch 140 (circtddc 1817).
23 F. Cas. 515 (Swann ex rel. Estate Bank v. Scholfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lucille H. Burch v. Reading Company
240 F.2d 574 (Third Circuit, 1957)