Swank v. Schrader

559 So. 2d 106, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2254, 1990 WL 38707
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 1990
DocketNo. 89-01363
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 106 (Swank v. Schrader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swank v. Schrader, 559 So. 2d 106, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2254, 1990 WL 38707 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the trial of this personal injury action, the court admitted into evidence a traffic citation received, prior to the subject accident, by Mr. Swank, the plaintiff below. The trial court also admitted into evidence the fact that Mr. Swank was charged with, and pled guilty to, driving under the influence some two and one-half years after the occurrence of the subject accident.

We find the cumulative error of the admission of this evidence to require a new trial. Accordingly, the case is reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bain v. State
559 So. 2d 106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 So. 2d 106, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2254, 1990 WL 38707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swank-v-schrader-fladistctapp-1990.