Swanick v. Lorish
This text of Swanick v. Lorish (Swanick v. Lorish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CINDY SWANICK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF GWENDOLYN HARVEY-HAMP,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-571
PATRICK LORISH,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 25, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Edward L. Scott, Judge.
Cindy Swanick, Ocala, pro se.
Lorenzo Ramunno, of Ramunno Law Firm, P.A., Ocala, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Cindy Swanick, individually and as personal representative for Gwendolyn Harvey-
Hamp, appeals an order granting a motion to strike filed by Lorenzo Ramunno, Esq.,
Swanick's former attorney, in Swanick's mother's probate case. We reverse the portion
of the order that prohibits Swanick or her agents from disseminating, publishing or
communicating, in any form whatsoever, contents of the probate case and all related matters because the trial court failed to conduct a proper constitutional inquiry. See Fox
v. Hamptons at Metrowest Condo. Ass'n, 223 So. 3d 453 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). The order
is affirmed in all other respects.1
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
ORFINGER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
1 Our opinion does not affect the temporary injunction in place in Marion County case number 42-2017-CA-418.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Swanick v. Lorish, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swanick-v-lorish-fladistctapp-2018.