Swan v. Tapley

102 N.E. 916, 216 Mass. 61, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1323
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 22, 1913·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Sheldon, J.

The appellant had no real interest in the proceedings, and was not a proper party thereto. He was not aggrieved by the decree. Potter v. Wheeler, 13 Mass. 504, 506. His wife’s undivided interest, as one of her father’s heirs, in the property of which partition had been sought was her separate property, and he had no vested interest therein. Harrington v. Harrington, 13 Gray, 513. Fales v. Fales, 148 Mass. 42. Flynn v. Flynn, 171 Mass. 312. The decree dismissing the appeal must be affirmed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swan v. Tapley, 102 N.E. 916, 216 Mass. 61, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1323 (Mass. 1913).

102 N.E. 916 (Swan v. Tapley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monroe v. Cooper
235 Mass. 33 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)
Hayden v. Keown
232 Mass. 259 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1919)