Swan v. Tapley
This text of 102 N.E. 916 (Swan v. Tapley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant had no real interest in the proceedings, and was not a proper party thereto. He was not aggrieved by the decree. Potter v. Wheeler, 13 Mass. 504, 506. His wife’s undivided interest, as one of her father’s heirs, in the property of which partition had been sought was her separate property, and he had no vested interest therein. Harrington v. Harrington, 13 Gray, 513. Fales v. Fales, 148 Mass. 42. Flynn v. Flynn, 171 Mass. 312. The decree dismissing the appeal must be affirmed.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 N.E. 916, 216 Mass. 61, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swan-v-tapley-mass-1913.