Swan v. DDL Books, Inc.

706 So. 2d 131, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2128, 1998 WL 88409
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 1998
DocketNo. 97-3319
StatusPublished

This text of 706 So. 2d 131 (Swan v. DDL Books, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swan v. DDL Books, Inc., 706 So. 2d 131, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2128, 1998 WL 88409 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court properly considered the Kinney1 factors and because sufficient jurisdictional facts were alleged to satisfy the requirements of the long-arm [132]*132statute, § 48.193, Fla. Stat. (1997), and due process minimum contacts, Venetian Salami Co. v. J.S. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989), we find that the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens and/or lack of personal jurisdiction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co.
674 So. 2d 86 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais
554 So. 2d 499 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 131, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2128, 1998 WL 88409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swan-v-ddl-books-inc-fladistctapp-1998.