Swan v. DDL Books, Inc.
This text of 706 So. 2d 131 (Swan v. DDL Books, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the trial court properly considered the Kinney1 factors and because sufficient jurisdictional facts were alleged to satisfy the requirements of the long-arm [132]*132statute, § 48.193, Fla. Stat. (1997), and due process minimum contacts, Venetian Salami Co. v. J.S. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989), we find that the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens and/or lack of personal jurisdiction.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 So. 2d 131, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2128, 1998 WL 88409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swan-v-ddl-books-inc-fladistctapp-1998.