Swan-Edwards Co. v. Union Savings Bank

87 S.E. 825, 17 Ga. App. 572, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 790
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 27, 1916·No. 6507·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. A bank is presumed to know the signature of one of its depositors, and therefore can not recover from a bona fide holder for value money paid by the bank upon a cheek to which- the drawer’s signature was forged, unless it appears that the holder, by his own negligence, contributed to the success of the fraud practised, or his conduct had a tendency to mislead the drawee, which was itself free from fault. Woods v. Colony Bank, 114 Ga. 683 (2), 685 (40 S. E. 720, 56 L. R. A. 929); 2 Michie on Banks and Banking, § 147, p. 1196, and cases there cited. Any seeming conflict in principle between this ruling and the ruling in Woods v. Colony Bank, supra, disappears on examination of the particular facts in that, case.

2. The instructions of the court complained of which were in conflict with the foregoing ruling were erroneous; and the failure to give requested instructions which conformed it was also error. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swan-Edwards Co. v. Union Savings Bank, 87 S.E. 825, 17 Ga. App. 572, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 790 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

87 S.E. 825 (Swan-Edwards Co. v. Union Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cairo Banking Co. v. West
2 S.E.2d 91 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Railway Express Agency v. Bank of Philadelphia
150 So. 525 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)
Farmers Bank v. Bank of Abbeville
116 S.E. 204 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)